|
Using
reverse osmosis and evaporation for the treatment of wastewater
containing moderate levels of chlorides at an underground rock salt
mining operation
Daniel J. Redetzke,
Geologist March 14, 2002
Independent Salt Company
Kanopolis, Kansas
Abstract
The Independent Salt Company located near
Kanopolis, Kansas, is a conventional underground rock salt mining
operation. The product, rock salt, is used for roadway de-icing,
agricultural feed mixing, and hide curing processes. Naturally
occurring, saline groundwater, from various formations and rock types,
seeping into two of the vertical mineshafts that access the underground
workings, is the source of slightly contaminated water with moderate
chloride levels. Structures within the walls of the mineshafts, called
water rings, collect this groundwater that is piped to a temporary
holding tank located at the mining level. After a brief settling period
it is pumped back to the surface, where it formerly flowed into an
unlined earthen lagoon for evaporation. Through the evaporation and
settling processes, both the suspended and dissolved solids in the
wastewater were concentrated and precipitated onto the bottom of the
lagoon as sludge. Changes in environmental laws made the use of unlined
earthen lagoons for the treatment of chloride-contaminated wastewater
unacceptable.
In conjunction with Wichita based American
Industrial Water a pilot study designed to test the use of
reverse osmosis for the removal of chlorides from the wastewater was
conducted and yielded promising results. The process removes chlorides
and other organic salts and dissolved solids from the wastewater by
allowing the passage of the water molecules but rejecting 90%-95% of the
dissolved ions. This effectively removes the chlorides from the
wastewater by not allowing them to pass through the membrane. The
rejected ions become concentrated in a reject stream that is typically
flushed to a drain. In this case, the reject stream cannot be
discharged as it contains high levels of chlorides and other dissolved
solids. As a result, underground evaporation experiments were conducted
to determine the maximum amount of reject water, generated by the
reverse osmosis process, that could be evaporated in the underground
mine workings. This information provided the design parameters for the
permanent reverse osmosis system. These experiments yielded results
suggesting it is possible to effectively evaporate more than the
expected amount of reject from the reverse osmosis process with little
or no negative impact on the mine itself.
Introduction
The Independent Salt Company opened for business
in 1913. The original mine shaft and mill building are still in
operation today. The product, rock salt, was originally used by the
meatpacking and processing industry and is now used primarily for
roadway de-icing, agricultural feed mix, and hide curing processes.
During the sinking phase of the original mine shaft, attempts were made
to stop the seepage of groundwater into the mineshaft as it slowly
penetrated the earth punching through multiple zones of saturation.
Attempts to stop the water were unsuccessful and the only alternative
was to install a collection and pumping system to continually dewater
the shaft. At some point in time, a non-overflowing storage lagoon for
the wastewater was constructed on the surface. This lagoon later became
a potential source of groundwater contamination through the
concentration and leaching of chlorides from the lagoon into the
surrounding soils. New environmental regulations required operators to
close these earthen lined lagoons and install synthetically lined
lagoons or find other alternative treatment methods.
History
The original chloride levels in the water from the
mineshafts were not recorded. However, records from the 1970’s and
1980’s indicate chloride levels in the wastewater at that time were
ranging around 5000 parts per million, nearly five times current
levels. In 1991, a letter from the Kansas Department of Health and
Environment was issued to the Independent Salt Company stating the
unlined earthen lagoon was no longer an acceptable method of wastewater
treatment and a plan for lagoon closure be submitted for approval and
alternative treatments explored. For the next nine years, several ideas
were proposed and the KDHE granted several extensions on the existing
wastewater lagoon permit to facilitate the ongoing investigation of
alternative treatments.
Determination of groundwater flow rates
The first step in the serious investigation of
alternative treatments was to determine the amount of water to be
treated. Multiple measurements were taken over an 18-month period to
determine an accurate average water inflow rate. These measurements
were taken in the underground wastewater storage tank to determine the
combined water inflow rates from both shafts as they both flow into a
common tank. The surface area of this tank was calculated and a series
of depth measurements at timed intervals were taken to determine inflow
in gallons per minute. These measurements were taken from mid 2000 to
present. The total average inflow rate is 4.7 gallons per minute.
Investigation of treatment alternatives
Reverse osmosis was briefly considered in
1996 as a possible treatment alternative but, due to insufficient data
on the operational and maintenance costs of such a system, was not
pursued. Consideration was given to the proposal of installing two
synthetically lined lagoons on the surface for the evaporation of the
wastewater at an estimated cost of $500,000.00. After reviewing these
earlier engineering reports, consideration was again given to reverse
osmosis as a treatment option. A decision was made to install and
operate a reverse osmosis pilot plant to study its effectiveness and
efficiency in the treatment of the wastewater.
The pilot plant was designed and built by American
Industrial Water based on the specific chemical analysis of the
wastewater from this operation. It was installed, operated, and
monitored over a two-month period. The purpose of the study was to
determine the effects of the high TDS water (approximately 4000 parts
per million) on the reverse osmosis membranes, such as the effectiveness
of an anti-scalant additive, typical ion rejection, and the maximum
recovery rates possible. The pilot plant treated the wastewater at a
rate of 4.5 gallons per minute. This system was operated for over 200
hours with promising results. Through observation, sampling, and
chemical analysis, it was concluded the reverse osmosis system could
consistently remove nearly 95% of the chlorides from the water and the
anti-scalant additive kept the membranes from fouling during at least
200 hours of operation. It was later found, after the installation of
the permanent reverse osmosis unit, this same additive worked
effectively for as long as 1200 hours of continuous operation. Simple
cleaning of the membranes with a mild acidic solution would then be
required to fully restore the membranes ability to function normally.
It was also determined that nearly 70% recovery was achievable with this
type of system. The chemical analysis for the wastewater (raw water),
treated water (permeate), and discharged water (blend), is shown in
appendix 1.
Underground evaporation tests
In December 2000, underground evaporation of all
wastewater was investigated as a possible method of treatment. Testing
was conducted in the underground mine workings to determine evaporation
rates and the evaporative capacity of the mine atmosphere.
The first experiment was designed to determine
evaporation rates in gallons per square foot of surface area per day. A
plastic lined cell, approximately four feet wide by eight feet long by
six inches deep was constructed of plywood, lumber, and thin plastic
sheeting. It was filled with under saturated brine water (about 85%
saturated with sodium chloride) and the depth of the cell was measured
periodically to determine an evaporation rate. Table 1 shows the
results from this experiment.
|
UNDERGROUND EVAPORATION RATE EXPERIMENT NUMBER ONE, PLASTIC LINED
CELL, 45"W X 96.375"L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/30/00 |
1/2/01 |
1/9/01 |
1/14/01 |
1/22/01 |
1/26/01 |
1/31/01 |
|
Water depth, inches |
3.75 |
3.4375 |
3 |
2.75 |
2.25 |
2.0625 |
1.6875 |
|
Hours passed since first measurement |
0 |
70 |
233 |
354 |
545 |
641 |
762 |
|
Gallons per hour |
|
0.084 |
0.06 |
0.053 |
0.052 |
0.049 |
0.051 |
|
Gallons/Ft.^2/Day |
|
0.067 |
0.048 |
0.042 |
0.041 |
0.039 |
0.041 |
Table 1
The next experiment was to determine the mine’s
ambient temperature and humidity and how elevated humidity affected the
mine. Again, measurements were taken over an 18-month period using a
sling psychrometer to gather data. Average humidity was determined to
be 55% and average temperature was 70.5 degrees Fahrenheit and remained
very stable throughout the entire period. Measurements and
observations were also made at the intake airway, which is exposed to
extreme variations in temperature and humidity throughout the year, to
determine the cause and effect of condensation naturally occurring near
that location. It was discovered the extreme changes in intake
temperature and humidity only affected the mine over a short distance
and within that distance and beyond, humidity never exceeded 74%. Any
humidity rising above 74% immediately caused condensation of water on
the surrounding surfaces, which caused the humidity to drop back to 74%
quickly. The salt seems to temper and stabilize the air after it enters
the underground workings and after less than 4000 feet of linear travel
the air temperature is near 70 degrees Fahrenheit and humidity is
between 45% and 55% and remains there constantly throughout the year.
Condensation results in dissolution and re-deposition of salt in the
same general area with no negative impact. Surface temperature and
humidity does not directly affect the majority of the air in the mine.
In other words, no matter what the surface conditions are, the salt
seems to keep the air within the mine stable at 70.5 degrees Fahrenheit
at 55% humidity.
During this period several evaporation
experiments were conducted underground using a system of fine mist spray
nozzles assembled and installed in the main exhaust airway far from the
intake shaft to minimize the effects of unstable air. This helped
determine the effects of elevated humidity on the mine independent from
the effects of the surface conditions. Water was supplied to the spray
system utilizing head pressure from the vertical discharge pipe in the
main shaft, which contains a maximum 233 gallons of water at 365psi when
full. Water was bled back from the vertical pipe system and fed through
the spray nozzle system at 100 psi using an inline pressure regulator
and valve. Humidity and airflow measurements were taken down wind from
the spray area using a sling psychrometer and anemometer. Approximate
evaporation rates were determined using a psychrometric chart. Spray
nozzles with various flow rates were tested using different pressures
and configurations to determine the best system to maximize evaporation
efficiency. The results from one of these experiments are shown in table
2.
|
Evaporation experiment number four 1/26/01 |
All measurements taken with Bacharach sling psychrometer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
Location |
Wet bulb |
Dry bulb |
RH% |
#Nozzles |
Nozzle spacing |
Pressure |
Seconds to fill 250ml |
Total flow rate,GPH |
|
6:20am |
0, 2 |
61.5 |
71 |
57% |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
6:27am |
|
|
|
|
4 |
0,33,66,100' |
120 |
|
|
|
6:35am |
|
|
|
|
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
120 |
18 |
13.2 |
|
6:41am |
0, 2 |
61.5 |
69.5 |
63% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
110 |
|
|
|
6:45am |
|
|
|
|
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
105 |
20 |
11.9 |
|
6:50am |
0, 9 |
61.5 |
71 |
57% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
100 |
|
|
|
6:55am |
0, 6 |
62 |
69 |
67% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
90 |
|
|
|
6:57am |
0, 2 |
62 |
69.5 |
65% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
85 |
|
|
|
7:01am |
0, 2 |
62 |
70 |
64% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
80 |
|
|
|
7:10am |
|
62 |
69.5 |
65% |
4 |
0,33,66,100 |
100 |
|
|
|
7:20am |
Shaft, top |
59 |
62 |
83% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7:30am |
Shaft, top |
59 |
62 |
88% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7:35am |
Surface |
36 |
37.5 |
86% |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2
Based on the data from these experiments, and
considering the airflow and geothermal energy available from the
surrounding rocks, it was calculated that a maximum of 1.5 gallons per
minute of water could be evaporated in the underground mine workings.
Normally, the evaporation process cools air as humidity rises. In the
underground mine, geothermal energy heats humidified air as it travels
past the rock effectively lowering the humidity. This allows the same
air to carry more moisture away from the evaporation area than would be
the case if geothermal energy were not present. The system is at its
maximum capacity when the humidity reaches 73% at no more than 4000’
downwind from the evaporation area. This protects the mine from
condensation beyond that zone.
Also discovered during the humidity measuring
process was the occurrence of natural dehumidification caused by
moisture being absorbed by the surrounding salt. Humidity measurements
were taken at the base of the intake airway during cool and very humid
climatic conditions on the surface. Tests revealed that 50-degree air
at 90% relative humidity quickly became 70-degree air at 45% relative
humidity. The only way this is possible is through absorption of water
by the salt surfaces within the mine. This process occurs very rapidly
as the air travels a distance of approximately 4000’ in the underground
workings. Figure 1 shows one example of the effects of the mine on cool
intake air.

After carefully examining all of the data, the
maximum evaporative capacity of the mine atmosphere was determined to be
approximately 1.5 gallons per minute. With this evaporation rate the
relative humidity in the mine would rise to nearly 73% with a dry bulb
temperature of 70-71 degrees Fahrenheit.
Results and effects of actual underground evaporation
The reverse osmosis system and the pretreatment
filtration from American Industrial Water of Wichita, Ks. has been in
operation since November of 2001. A mixture of treated water and raw
water has been continuously discharged on the surface since that time to
simulate natural waters. The ultra-pure permeate from the process is
actually too clean to discharge according to KDHE. Periodic sampling
and testing has been conducted to ensure the discharged water meets
drinking water standards. The reject water from the process has been
continuously discharged through a 10-nozzle spray system located in the
underground mine workings for evaporation. It became apparent the
evaporation rate of the spray system was dependent on the amount of
airflow directly through the spray mist. The nozzles of the permanent
installation are not as affective in evaporation due to localized
airflow in the area of the nozzles. The formation of a large
underground pond has occurred and current humidity measurements indicate
an evaporation rate of approximately 0.5 gallons per minute from the
surface of the pond. As the surface area of this pond increases, it is
expected evaporation rates will also continue to increase until
equilibrium with the inflow rate into the pond occurs. Once this
happens, the surface area of the pond should become static. There have
been no negative effects from the elevated humidity levels to date.
Effects of the underground ponded water
Because the ponded water is in direct contact with
salt, and because the spray system is designed to spray the reject water
over a pile of waste salt before it enters the pond, the water quickly
becomes nearly saturated with salt. However, once the waste salt pile
has been dissolved away, the relatively fresh incoming water begins to
“float” on the surface of the brine pond and slowly “cuts” into the
surrounding pillars and walls of salt by the process of dissolution
until it becomes saturated. This process has been observed and is
controllable in two ways. The first way, spraying the reject water over
a pile of waste salt, is the simplest, easiest to maintain, and most
effective. The second method is to install an impermeable barrier
around the edge of the surface of the pond where the fresh water has a
chance to come into contact with the salt. This barrier extends several
inches below the surface of the water and effectively prevents
dissolution of the pillars by preventing contact with the floating fresh
water. Both methods have been tested and both seem to be effective in
protecting the surrounding surfaces from damage. There have been no
other negative effects observed to date.
Appendix 1
|
Sample Description: Raw Water Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
Concentration |
Units |
|
Date
Analyzed |
|
Barium, Total |
ND
(0.10) |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Calcium, Total |
450.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Iron, Total |
3.33 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Magnesium, Total |
61.10 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Manganese, Total |
3.20 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Potassium, Total |
15.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Silicon as Silica |
12.30 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Sodium, Total |
660.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Strontium, Total |
4.48 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Alkalinity, Total, as CaCO3 |
230.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
BOD |
ND
(5) H |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Chloride |
1000.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Fluoride |
ND
(0.1) |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Nitrate/Nitrite as N |
1.20 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Orthophosphate, as P |
0.2
H |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Solids, Total Suspended |
14.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Solids, Total Dissolved |
3462.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
Sulfate |
1100.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
3/28/01 |
|
pH |
7.60 |
|
std.
Units |
|
3/28/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Description: Permeate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
Concentration |
Units |
|
Date
Analyzed |
|
Chloride |
51.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/10/01 |
|
Solids, Total Dissolved |
110.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/14/01 |
|
Solids, Total Suspended |
ND
(2) |
|
mg/L |
|
11/15/01 |
|
Sulfate |
20.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/10/01 |
|
pH |
6.18 |
|
std.
Units |
|
11/9/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Description: Discharge Water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
Concentration |
Units |
|
Date
Analyzed |
|
Chloride |
220.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/10/01 |
|
Solids, Total Dissolved |
760.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/14/01 |
|
Solids, Total Suspended |
ND
(2) |
|
mg/L |
|
11/15/01 |
|
Sulfate |
230.00 |
|
mg/L |
|
11/10/01 |
|
pH |
7.35 |
|
std.
Units |
|
11/9/01 |
|